.
Feedback

NUSD's Five Budget Realities for the Coming School Year

Here is the latest installation of Karen Maloney's CFO Corner column.

The following is from a column called CFO's Corner written by  Chief Financial Officer Karen Maloney. Her columns are published occasionally on the district's website, www.nusd.org.

As the completes the 2011-12 school year with marked improvement in student achievement, we again face the challenges of a state budget that significantly underfunds education. This is the fifth year that school districts have not received a state cost-of-living adjustment (known as COLA) and instead are being funded at 77 percent of the revenue limit. For NUSD, the non-funding of a COLA represents a loss of $1.6 million for the 2012-13 year. The total loss of funding for the five years is $39 million, which is equivalent to one year's funding for NUSD.

Budget Reality No. 1

The governor's budget does not increase school funding. It will decrease by $441 per student, or $3.3 million for NUSD, if the November tax measure fails.

A flat budget is really a negative budget as a COLA is not provided to give the necessary funding for Step and Column growth, increases for insurance, utilities, books and other supplies, and the loss of federal one-time funding. NUSD will pay out $2.5 million more in expenditures than it will receive in revenues. Had the state funded the stated COLA, NUSD would have received an increase of $212 per student, or $1.6 million.

The state budget assumes that the tax initiative will be approved by voters in November 2012. Should that not occur, funding for schools will be cut in January 2013, the seventh month of the school year. For NUSD, the estimated cut will be $3.3 million, or $441 per student.

Budget Reality No. 2

NUSD's expenses exceed NUSD's revenues. 

For the past four years, the district has offset the shortfall of revenues due to one-time federal stimulus funding. Funding for 6.6 full-time certificated positions and 20.53 classified positions was provided by the $1.6 million from the Federal Jobs Bill last year. That funding is not continued into the 2012-13 year, resulting in deficit spending as positions were maintained rather than eliminated.

As there will not be any additional state funding or federal funding coming in, district costs were reduced in the 2012-13 year and significant cuts will be needed for the 2013-14 and 2014-15 years to correct the structural deficit. Employee salary and benefits comprise 89 percent of the expenditures of the district.

Budget Reality No. 3

NUSD has a multi-year structural deficit that must be corrected.

To achieve and sustain financial solvency, it is necessary to solve the multi-year structural deficit with ongoing expense reductions. Difficult decisions need to be made to reverse the current spending plan where expenses exceed revenues. A study of comparative districts prepared by School Services of California will provide data as to class size ratios, teacher work days, instructional days, staff work days, spending levels per student for books, supplies and services.

Together, the school community consisting of teachers, classified workers, administrators, parents, community members and trustees, will examine the study along with the district budget to present solutions to fix the structural deficit. The Budget Advisory Committee will begin meeting in early August to begin this work.

Additionally, program budgeting was introduced to the district with principals and budget managers responsible for identifying and implementing more than $700,000 in budget reductions for 2012-13.

Budget Reality No. 4

Given no new revenues, new local resources must be identified and current sources must continue at the current rate or increased. 

The largest revenue source for the district is from the revenue limit — alias average daily attendance, or ADA — which makes up 65 percent of the total revenue as compared to 67 percent in 2007-08. It is imperative that students attend school each day for instructional and funding purposes and that the district identifies alternative solutions when students are unable to attend.

Investment in technology and other solutions will be required. Additionally, the district is undergoing a facility study that will provide information on how to maximize assets in order to generate revenues or to lessen the burden on the operating fund.

The district receives $4.3 million from a $251 parcel tax that expires in 2015. This funding provides for many things, including but limited to, libraries, counselors, athletics, instructional technology, reducing class size, and attracting and maintaining staff. The parcel tax has been the safety net for the district providing much needed funding for district positions. It is critical that the district continues to receive the support of the community through this parcel tax.

Budget Reality No. 5

Given no new revenues and known increases in expenses, both employee concessions and layoffs must be considered.

With flat funding provided from the state, possible mid-year reductions estimated at $3.3 million, expenditures exceeding revenues, and that salaries and benefits comprise 89 percent of the NUSD's unrestricted budget, the district has few options with which to overcome the budget shortfalls.

Governor Brown and the legislators in adopting the 2012-13 budget provided for school districts to reduce the number of instructional days from 180 to 160 days both in 2012-13 and 2013-14 for a total of 40 days over the two year period. 

Funding for school districts in California continues to be uncertain and inadequate. However, the needs of the 8,000 students at the 13 NUSD school sites remain constant. It is because of these children who receive instruction and other services from dedicated teachers, staff, administrators, food services workers, bus drivers, and the very many others, that make the decisions clear and meaningful.

Difficult financial decisions are before us. However, I am confident that together with student and family needs identified, the NUSD community will come together to make those difficult decisions.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Novato Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Craig Belfor May 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
Julia-I see that you've totally embraced censorship. Is that why you don't have much disagreement onRead More your blog about your high HOA fees? Thanks for reconfirming my fears that the Patch has turned into a tool of those who pay for propaganda at the expense of truth. The power is not with the voter, but with those who count the votes, and opinions are votes.
Roger May 18, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Belford, I agree with you that the new format is not user friendly. I can't find recent articles onRead More affordable housing or on the N. Redwood building ban.
Craig Belfor May 18, 2013 at 01:51 pm
What's with the ads blocking out the posts? I know you gotta pay the bills, but don't throw out theRead More baby with the bath water.
Craig Belfor May 18, 2013 at 05:51 pm
Making us start over is the plan to wear us down. Free press is paid for by advertisers, andRead More pressure is put out to stifle stories. That's what the tobacco industry did to 60 Minutes, and the Isreli government did to the Goldberg Report. The United Nations couldn't put out the story of mass genocide of the Palestinian people, and we'll be kicked off the blog soon because we don't advertise.
Tina McMillan May 18, 2013 at 04:36 pm
Craig I thought I was being overly suspicious but the new site eliminated months of research andRead More commentary and has replaced it with irrelevant banter and Ads. It won't even let you edit thoughts into smaller blocks or comment directly to another post. It is the ultimate dumbing down of Patch. If you have been following the Plan Bay Area debate here is a link to the response from the Supervisor's: http://www.marincounty.org/Main/~/media/Files/MarinGov/Board%20Actions/20130514CDAPlanBayArea-LTR.pdf There is also a presentation by the Marin Economic Forum on Plan Bay Area: Is it good for the region? Is it good for Marin? Calendar: Novato Community Alliance Title: Marin Economic Forum on Plan Bay Area Date: 30.05.2013 18:30 - 20:30 Location: Board of Supervisors' chambers at the Marin Civic Center in San Rafael " A forum sponsored by the Marin Economic Forum on the Plan Bay Area will be held from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. May 30th in the Board of Supervisors' chambers at the Marin Civic Center in San Rafael. Panelists will be Plan Bay Area proponents Marin Supervisor Steve Kinsey; Napa County Supervisor Mark Luce, president of ABAG; and critics Randal O'Toole of the Cato Institute, author of "Gridlock"; and Thomas Rubin, an Oakland-based transportation consultant and former chief financial officer of the Southern California Rapid Transit District. Moderator will be Marin Superior Court Judge Verna Adams. Admission is free."
Craig Belfor May 18, 2013 at 02:54 pm
We got sold down the river by the developers. Under the guise of a new improved format, they justRead More erased our history. Now we have to start defending our town all over again, while they are already in gear. Some of the opponants of AH can't get on anymore. Brent would not have allowed this to happen. Maybe that's why he left so suddenly, and unexpectedly.
Tina McMillan May 17, 2013 at 11:41 am
Peter I am not sure which group you are referring to. I belong to Novato Community Alliance andRead More Novato Homeowners Association. Both are grassroots groups working with local government to ask much needed questions regarding Plan Bay Area. Your comments are reminiscent of a previous poster named Bud Lite who was engaged in heated exchanges. Since his name continued to evolve it was only his message that made him recognizable. No one can give you the world but NCA and NHA are both resources that can provide information and discussion of important local issues.
Peter May 17, 2013 at 11:28 am
Hello, It took our groups letters to get the change as we do not want to read someones garbageRead More that takes twenty posts to say one thing . I have never had a heated exchange with you but I can tell you I was sick of reading your garbage like a lot of other people were. You and your group promised the world, told it the only way you wanted the outcome to be and got caught by the real people of Novato
Tina McMillan May 17, 2013 at 08:45 am
Peter aka Bud Lite Welcome back. Its good to know some things never change, like folks that trollRead More for a heated exchange.
Roger May 18, 2013 at 05:10 pm
Tina, I agree that we should avoid the Patch until it returns the old format. Advertisers will jumpRead More out as well be because frequent users like you are leaving. Let's skip away.
Joe May 17, 2013 at 02:16 pm
They will cry and complain on the computer all day and night . The will do everything to get theirRead More way except what counts . Get Involved,Run for the office or shut up .
Novato Chess Club May 17, 2013 at 02:02 pm
I like the fact we have a voice; it will improve. Go Novato, and the active citizens
Tracey Ruiz May 15, 2013 at 10:55 am
We had a story yesterday on Novato Patch with very lively discussion. Unfortunately it didn'tRead More migrate over with the new format. I'm hoping it will pop up soon.
Tia May 18, 2013 at 03:28 pm
Come out and cheer out local Novato high school teams. The kids are inspirational!
craig anderson May 16, 2013 at 11:22 am
This will be one of the toughest race courses of the season