This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Judy Arnold's Unethical Campaign Contribution from BMK

Voters are upset that Planned Parenthood recently gave $500 to Supervisor Susan Adams for her party to celebrate an unsuccessful recall against her.  After the Supervisors recently gave over $250,000 of taxpayer money to Planned Parenthood ($50,000+ alone from Supervisor Adams’ Slush Fund), this donation stinks, and should be returned.  Don’t get me wrong. I like both Susan Adams & Planned Parenthood. It isn’t them.  It’s the principle, as it reeks of political patronage.

There is another political donation, which in my book is far worse than the Adams/Planned Parenthood controversy.  The Bel Marin Keys Community Service District recently gave Supervisor Judy Arnold $1,000 for her re-election campaign.  A CSD is basically a town in an unincorporated area.  Could the Novato city council give a campaign contribution to Judy Arnold? Absolutely not! It would be unethical & illegal.  Towns can’t spend their residents’ tax money on political candidates. So why can the Bel Marin Keys CSD? I am not sure of the legality, but does anyone question the ethical lapse on both sides of this transaction?

I question the Bel Marin Keys CSD board for making this donation with residents’ funds. Homeowners pay approximately $500-$1,000/year for dredging & landscaping. Apparently some CSD board members feel that they can use our money as their own slush fund. I guess they think it is ok, since the Supervisors are allowed the same patronage & payola.  There is no mention in any board minutes of this donation, although it was mentioned in the IJ.  As a resident of Bel Marin Keys (and supporter of Judy’s opponent, Toni Shroyer), I am upset that others gave Mrs. Arnold my money without my approval, or any public disclosure. 

Find out what's happening in Novatowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Even more, I question Supervisor Judy Arnold’s judgment & ethics for accepting such a donation.  After someone has spent about 50 years in politics, should we need to question whether she knows the difference between right & wrong?  If we need our District Attorney to investigate Judy Arnold’s improper donation after all these years of her serving in politics, then maybe it is time for a new Supervisor.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?