patching...
Breaking: Man Angry at Police Tries to Gauge Out Officer's Eye »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Report Shows Marin is Missing Out on Revenue from Commuters

Live Local and Greenbelt Alliance release analysis that shows the economy would be boosted by more affordable housing options and keeping worker dollars local.

 

An affordable housing initiative and an environmental group from the Bay Area have released a new report that lays out the reasons why commuters heading into Marin for work are driven away by housing costs and creating a lack of localized consumer spending.

The report, released Tuesday by Live Local, says Marin’s economy has shifted to lower-paying retail and service jobs with workers who can’t afford to live here, thus increasing pressure on public transportation services.

“When workers’ wages are compared to what it costs to rent or buy a home in Marin versus other communities, it’s no wonder that many of the county’s workers live elsewhere,” said Sonoma State professor Robert Eyler of Marin Economic Forum, which provided the independent economic research and analysis for the report.

The report was released on the same day the Marin County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to adopt a plan to spread affordable housing throughout he county, not just in areas that have concentrations of minority populations.

More than 61,000 people who have jobs in Marin commute from outside the county each day, and every day they drive home with more than $1.4 billion in annual purchasing power, according to “Driving Home Economic Recovery" (attached).

Live Local, based in San Rafael and partially fueled by grants from the Marin Community Foundation, is a special collaboration of the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California and the Greenbelt Alliance, a 4,000-member environmental group with an office in San Rafael that advocates for open space, walkable neighborhoods and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

The report suggests Marin’s in-bound commuters are driven away by lack of affordable housing, and that creating more housing choices for just one percent of them, or 610 households, would prevent $14 million in annual consumer spending from draining to nearby counties. New revenues would support an estimated 97 new jobs in Marin.

Additionally, during the construction or renovation of 610 homes, Marin would see another $28 million infused into local economies and 181 construction-driven jobs created, the report said.

Dianne Spaulding, executive director of the Non-Profit Housing Association, said neighboring counties are offering more housing options affordable for Marin workers than Marin does.

“Suddenly, ‘passing the buck’ takes on a whole new meaning as Marin workers drive their paychecks home elsewhere,” she said in a release. “Marin is missing out on jobs and revenue that it could really use right now.”

Anthony Taylor, a resident of Homeward Bound’s Next Key Center transitional housing in Novato, said he is eager to start his own catering business but doesn’t believe he’ll find an affordable place to live in Marin.

“I struggled to turn my life around until Homeward Bound gave me new culinary skills and stable housing,” Taylor said. “I’m about to graduate from the program … but I may have to move to Vallejo and commute back to Marin. I just want to be able give back to the community that helped me.”

The report highlights that housing is getting built in Marin, just not enough of the right type to alleviate the economic problem. The report said Marin's economy has shifted to lower-paying retail and service sector jobs, such as teachers, in-home health aides, childcare workers and restaurant servers. However, the shift in the economy was not matched by home production priced for modest-wage workers.

For people who earn $80,000 or more per year, there is more housing being built than is needed by that workforce segment, the report contends. But for a 54 percent of in-commuters to Marin who earn less than $40,000, there is a shortfall between housing supply and demand.

Cynthia Murray, a former member of the Novato City Council and Marin County Board of Supervisors, said the findings show that Marin has the ability to strengthen communities, accelerate job growth and reduce congestion on Highway 101.

“And it’s feasible without putting all the strain on any one segment of our society,” said Murray, president of the North Bay Leadership Council. “Our employees do not have to suffer long commutes, nor do our business owners need to miss out on revenue.”

  • Do you agree with the basic findings of this report?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        33 (31%)
    • No
        72 (68%)
    Total votes: 105
  • This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Marin Economic Forum
What do you think about this analysis? Tell us in the comments.

Jill

3:47 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

This is another proppganda piece backed by the Marin Community Foundation.


Find out what is really going on and make your vote count before Novato reaches its tipping point.

ONE BAY AREA
http://www.onebayarea.org/plan_bay_area/
ABAG- REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION
http://www.abag.ca.gov/housing-top.html
LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxwpoLztx70

Reply
Comment_arrow

diane

3:22 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ditto on the propaganda idea

Scott

7:12 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Considering the source, is this really something that rises to the level of 'news' or is the patch getting paid to advertise for them?

If the patch is getting paid, shouldn't they disclose it?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Brent Ainsworth

11:41 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Just sharing bits of information I believe people might be interested in, Scott. It doesn't have to be news to appear on Patch. Same goes for other media (TV, radio, print, online).

Thomas

7:36 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

I would say that the assumptions, goal, directives, data, and conclusions are fairly suspect given that of course this is a report made not impartially. How can one speak from authority there about the will and need of Marin's people? It's a common problem with politically driven lobby groups, private 501c foundations, politicians that crony up in the same social groups, and others who will tell you what is best for you and the direction of your county. They expect a dogmatic response to their ideology. Yeah, more dense housing in South Marin perhaps? (chuckle).

Reply

Mark Schoenbaum

8:41 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

While I disagree with the report and it's biased source it does make a compelling argument for killing SMART now.

Reply

Susan Clark

10:24 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I totally disagree with Live Local and the Greenbelt Alliance. They are insane if they think Marin county owes everyone who works here an affordable home. STOP THE INSANITY!!!

Reply

Steven Norwin

10:37 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

OK, Marin County Liberalism is really getting out of control. We should be grateful to have a job and any roof over our heads... but no, Marin county seems to be giving everyone who cannot afford to live here a sense of entitlement.

Reply

Born & raised

11:19 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Maybe Marin can do more, but why Novato? Why not Belvedere,Corinthian Island, or out on Paradise Drive? O-yeah, nevermind.

Reply

Annan Paterson

3:26 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

I just read the report and the data is carefully noted and referenced. I have a lot of respect for Dr. Eyler of Sonoma State University and Marin Economic Forum who did the analysis. Living and working locally is good for families, our local businesses and the environment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Toni Shroyer

10:43 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Hi Annan,
You do get paid by the high density low income housing industry as do many people to push this agenda.

Comment_arrow

Annan Paterson

5:17 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

For the record, Toni's statement below is false and misleading.

Comment_arrow

Bob

8:48 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Annan, did the report show how much affordable housing in Novato/Marin is taken up by illegal immigrants? My guess is that they are not only taking up jobs but they are taking up affordable housing that citizens could use. It amazed me that there was not more upset when Meg Whitman's housekeeper was discovered to be here illegally and she was making $23 that a citizen could have been making.

And Annan, did the report show how much each resident has to pay to provide these low income housing units with public services such as police, fire sewer, schools, roads and other infrastructure? If these items are not included in the report then I submit that the report is bias.

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

9:11 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Annan

I agree that living and working locally is good for families, local business and the environment. The answer is not providing more housing for lower paying jobs; Novato needs to attract businesses providing living wages to its employees. We need to increase our current property tax base to reduce the five year projected budget deficit and we need to understand how little, sales tax does to offset the cost of affordable housing when you factor in our low wealth status as a school district. If we had the basic aid status of a city like Larkspur where our per pupil funding was more than double that of Novato's we could manage more affordable housing with less impact. The reality is that Novato is balancing tenuously on its current revenue with only two sources, property taxes and sales taxes. We need more well paid jobs not more state subsidized housing.

Trish Boorstein

8:17 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Annan, since next to San Rafael, southern Marin comes second with driving-in-commuters, then if live locally is the goal, there is the perfect spot for the 600 affordable housing units. Novato is third with driving-in-commuters and has 20% of Marins population and provides 33% of affordable housing.

Reply

Mark Cwirko

8:40 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Rather than subsidize housing, why don't we look at some real plans to create some jobs in Marin County and create some public transportation to SF (where the jobs are?). I don't see how making affordable housing a larger percentage of the housing stock in Novato or San Rafael is going to make those towns any better? It is not going to attract more business, those using affordable housing are not going to spur the local economies, and we've debated numerous times whether the associated rise in crime and cost of services is worth it. (Have your opinion - I don't want to stir up that debate again.) If MCF wants more affordable housing, let them raise money, build it and manage it. I want my tax dollars going to something that helps the local economy, not hinders it for the long-term.

The largest employer in Marin is the County. I believe the 2nd largest is Autodesk, and they have been slowly moving jobs to other areas (SF, and out of state). Few new businesses of any size are coming to Marin.

The main public transportation initiative has been SMART, and that is not resolving the issue. SMART does not go to SF, hence the only way it can EVER become economically viable is to create large job growth in Marin somewhere. What happened to the idea of a Ferry at the Port Sonoma location? That seems like an ideal situation to take some cars off the roads for Northern Marin and Southern Sonoma?

Reply

JoEllen Ussery

9:15 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

We need more jobs that pay more than $10.00 an hour. Not more housing for people who work the lowest paying, least secure jobs.

Not that I take issue with people who work these jobs, I take issue with the lack of jobs in Marin that pay more than $10.00 an hour.
We're one of the wealthiest Counties in the world, why don't we have more jobs that pay a decent wage?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brant

5:27 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

JoEllen, we don't have better paying jobs in Marin because we do not want industrial and commercial establishments here. They do not generate sales tax for our cities. That is, of course, a fundamental error in government decision making. Consider carefully who you vote for in November.

lisa

9:16 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

People shop where they work AND where they live.

Reply

Paul E.

9:39 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

This is report is supported by data and reason. The Marin Community Foundation does admirable work on behalf of those who need a helping hand, which also benefits all of us. Fox News (and probably most of the commentators here) like to call it "social engineering," but I call it sustainability and compassion. Beryl Buck was politically liberal, she donated a large portion of her money with the expressed purpose of providing support and opportunity to very low income and marginalized people. Fox News and friends have the Koch Brothers and most of the wealthy 1% 'feeding' a self-serving conservative agenda. Marin fortunately has Ms Buck's Foundation. And all of us, not just those in need of a helping hand, gain from the possibilities her money provides. Novato and San Rafael require more housing and support services because we are cities, and like all cities exist thanks to a diverse population of workers who provide for our many wants and necessities. (Ever seen a city of 50,000 with only large single family homes? Please ask yourself why not.) That tiny wealthy enclaves such as Ross and Belvedere are primarily about their own towns shouldn't give the rest of us license to turn our backs on those in need in ours, this includes the many workers with time-draining, costly and carbon gas spewing commutes. By providing affordable home options for some of those already working here and serving us, we create a more environmentally and economically sustainable community for us all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

12:17 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Sorry to say it, but a pretty ignorant response. Typical hyperbole found with some of you on Patch with your generalizations and erroneous political rhetoric. It's "Fox News", it's "the Koch Brother's" (LOL!!), it's "conservatives vs liberals". Nice try, but that is simply bull feces to attempt to distract from what is a real conversation about local city planning and what quality of life, load on our schools, and load on our streets and infrastructure that Marinites want, versus big developer money and RE investors moving in with AH dense housing advocates at their lobby.

Comment_arrow

Lloyd

7:01 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You call Novato a City. Care to tell me where that City is actually located. Novato is a collection of neighborhood areas without a real or viable central downtown. We need more unfunded mandates like we need a hole in the head. If you want to talk about compassion how about taking into account those of us who already live and work here. It seems in your world of free entitlement and platitudes there is never enough given to the needy. So I ask you why aren't you pushing for affordable housing to be built where these people actually work in Southern Marin?

Cindy

10:24 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Put lowcost housing in Southern Marin, Novato has done it's share. Don't believe this propaganda, Marin Community Foundation is doing it's work again to try to push forward something Novato doesn't need or want.

Reply

Karen Turnbaugh

3:26 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Anyone with the least bit of mathematical ability can use statistics to write a story they want to tell. Affordable housing advocates do just that. Take for example, the 99%ers. They imply by their label that are and speak for everyone not in the top 1%. Another use of numbers to mislead. While I am not in the 1%, I do not think anyone who is owes me anything. That would be greedy on my part.

For you share the wealth, government and/or the wealthy owe me residents of Marin, who want to build affordable housing, I whole heartedly support sharing affordable housing with you. The citizens of Belvedere, Tiburon, Ross, Kentfield, San Anselmo, Sausalito, Mill Valley, etc, etc are entitled to the wealth that comes from a cultural and diversity.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Turnbaugh

3:29 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Submitted before complete...
...cultural and diverse population.

Comment_arrow

Trish Boorstein

5:24 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Remember the CNN report about the whitest cities in America, correct me if I'm wrong, that identified several of them as being in Marin County? It's too bad that they didn't list the cities by name, because I'm pretty confident that Novato and San Rafael were not on that list. Equity, if it's going to be tossed around, is sharing these mandates equally among all jurisdictions so that not only one city gets nailed with a depletion of resources. This only perpetuates low-wealth-school districts while other cities can enjoy living in a high-wealth-school district and not have to worry about their property values plummeting.

Comment_arrow

Demosthenes

8:58 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Karen- could you please clarify? are you saying that your opposition to affordable housing is because of the racial make-up of the residents?

Comment_arrow

Karen Turnbaugh

1:20 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Demosthenes, nowhere do I mention or imply race. There is cultural diversity within and between races, religions, countries, etc. So please, please Demosthenes, don't make this a racial issue and keep your racist implications to yourself. Shame on you for playing this overused, ignorant tactic.

Toni Shroyer

10:38 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

What this report doesn't tell you is, non-profit housing does not pay for our infrastructure; which includes our public schools and our police services, yet will use them. Non-profit housing is tax exempt for 55 years and receives grants and bonds to purchase the land and develop. Affordable housing isn't affordable. Eden Housing $400,000 per unit to build is excessive when you can buy condos for well under $200,000 in Novato. In addition, there is no accountibility of the non-profit to provide safe housing. They don't have to ( as in the example of the Wyndover Apartments). The average household income of the Novato resident (per Marin Housing Authority) is approx $61,000 a year, yet Novatans are being required to pay for housing for those who make over $90,000 AND sholder the infrastructure for the investor/non-profit that can make millions a year off of rents (as the Wyndover Apartments does, our most clear example).
This study does not include telecommuting (which many of us do) or free choice. Many people work in Novato and live elsewhere because they want to--- like many Novato employees which can well afford to live her (ie The Planning Dept. staff).
High Density Low Income Housing is a failed model and it is failing here in Novato. The concentration of poverty is prejudice and unfair. I disagree with a lot of what Jeanne MacLeamy has done or not done, but I do agree we her in the need to scatter AH rather than clump them all together.

Reply

Lloyd

7:15 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I find this report to be self serving and lacking any real credibility. I am disappointed to see it given article status which implies credibility. The truth is this is just another push to bully Novato into accepting an unfair disbursement of affordable housing. We have had this debate and the simple fact is every community should be held equally accountable to helping provide AH. There is a tipping point when there are no employment opportunities, and taxpayer provided services are overloaded and negatively impacted. This report conveniently ignores simple realities. What I find most disturbing is the lack of any consideration for the welfare of the over 50k people that already live here. MCF and its privately funded political action groups such as those mentioned in this article have an agenda that is designed to alter reality and facts to fit their notion of what everyone else should do. Ever wonder why the BOD of MCF never take a stand on having their nannies and gardeners living near their enclaves in AH housing? It is hypocrisy and they should be ashamed of calling themselves advocates for AH until they are willing to walk the walk instead of using talk and checkbooks to relieve their consciences at all of our expenses.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

9:06 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I just read the report. It is just a propaganda piece trying to masquerade as news. There is one especially galling chart that purports to show average monthly wages in a variety of sectors, but I am quite sure it should be average weekly wages...only off by say, a factor of four. Using their numbers of a $215k average housing unit (never mind that new Eden is essentially double that)-610 new households at an average property tax rate of 1.2% (which is conservative) is $1.574MM per year in property tax, every year, that will never be received. The report also acts as if one new housing unit is 1 person, it isn't, it's on aveage about 2.5 people...so then we have more and more strain on limited resources. MCF would do a lot better if they made a REAL (not lip service) effort to working out how to get people into foreclosures, which would have an even better ongoing multiplier effect for any area in which this done-interest rates are at record lows, foreclosures are at record highs-building new housing is not the answer here.

Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:43 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

@Bob: A cogent and good analysis.

It's important we understand that the figures put forth are often not challenged enough.

Toni Shroyer

8:19 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

So Annan, you are not getting paid anything by SUNN? Nothing at all? Please clarify.
Dick's Spotswoods column in the Marin Ij said you were getting a "stipend". Is this incorrect? That is where I was getting information regarding you being paid. If you are not getting paid anything at all, then please say so. Many people are.
I am also correct in saying there is a lot of money in the high density low income housing industry. With tax exemptions, tax bonds, grants, donations etc---coupled with income of rents, it is a cash cow. The Wyndover Apartments is a prime example of this. Look how many people are working for the "non-profits" and getting paid well.
What is very disturbing is AH industry has no regard for our police services or public schools and how they will survive with the influx of more and more and more people whose housing does not support these services. Novato has done a great job with AH, yet as one council member stated, "it will never be enough for the state."
The state is such a mess, and now they are telling us what to do! Our local control is eroding day by day.
Annan, how do you suggest our infrastructure will support all this housing that you and the nonprofits want? Please tell me where the jobs will be for this "work force housing." Is this about building walls and walking away? Where are the social programs to help escape the cycle of poverty?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

9:01 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Are there any statistics that show how many folks that live in subsidized housing in Novato, actually have jobs?

Perhaps this is something that should be included in this report?

Comment_arrow

Marla

12:25 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

BOb,

Good question. Most residents of Marin County's existing affordable homes are working families, approximately 90% of whom lived and worked in Marin prior to lving in affordable housing. Of course, the senior and disabled housing is the exception as their residents don't work for the most part.
Here's the data. If the link is too long to work, just google Marin County Affordable Housing Inventory 2008
http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/cd/main/housing/publications/pdf/Marin_County_Affordable_Housing_Inventory_Study2008.pdf

Lloyd

8:39 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Toni the simple truth is the state agenda is to placate the electorate without regard to consequence. In a faltering economy rather than display fiscal responsibility politicians and their benefactors find it much easier to simply mandate unfunded pipe dreams of the American Way of life. They just got burnt by allowing every one who wanted a home to have one regardless of consequence and plunged us into the worse recession/depression since the 30's. With that idea fresh in their minds they have now decided if they can't give people homes they can at least placate the masses through these type of initiatives that do nothing to alleviate the cycle of poverty. Simply moving people out of the city to the suburbs without education, jobs programs, proper support of local services are just the way they deflect from the need for real reform and progress. It is further clear that the shrinking middle class is being asked to shoulder the entire burden so the elite can point to at places like Novato and say "see they are not cooperating" "They are preventing you from having housing" It is nonsense and they are playing on the fears, needs and insecurity to avoid any real reform by the upper elitist class. Sounds like 101 class in sociology never the less true.

Reply

Marla

8:59 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Toni,

Wyndover is atypical. Built 50 years ago as market rate housing, taken over by an absentee, out of town, primarily market rate owner who spun off a non-profit. Most affordable housing is built by mission-driven local non-profits and all of these are successful. We have close to 100 neighborhoods like that throughout Marin that serve the disabled, seniors, and working families. Your fixation with Wyndover may be preventng you from seeing the positive examples like The Next Key (30 units/acre), NovaRo III (34 units/acre), The Villas (50 units/acre), or lower density Mackey Terrace, Meadow Park, Creekside etc all wonderful Novato neighborhoods. Take a visit to San Clemente in Corte Madera, watch the families playing in the Courtyard playground, visit thDrakes Way in Larkspur which had 7 applicants for each unit. Nobody wants an absentee owner, whether market rate or not, but the Police are dealing w/ Wyndover management, and the 1% of Novato police calls that it used to represent (many for non-crime noise complaints) has dropped by 50% due to their efforts. (See Patch article on this http://novato.patch.com/articles/progress-made-with-pd-calls-for-service-at-wyndover-chief-says ) Typical local non-profits invest in community, pay on-going parcel taxes for schools, City Fees, permits, water hook-up fees etc. Not to mention the multiplier affect of residents who aren't so stretched paying 50-60% of their income on rent they can spend more locally.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

9:10 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla, I think it is misleading to list mostly senior housing as your examples, most senior housing is not a crime problem, and not a good example of the affordable housing being discussed here.

Counting the police calls to Wyndover is just part of the Wyndover picture. Once these unsavory folks are living in our community they commit their criminal activity all over our town.

Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

9:26 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla
I know "W" may be "atypical", but it is a very real problem. The crime progress cited by the chief was just lip service at a council meeting, and was not backed by hard numbers-the Chief can use charges, I can use dispatches...matters not, it is a problem, and needs correcting. Mandating improvement on this would be a very worthwhile cause, and one the community would get behind (in a big way)
For all the wonderfulness, I can also point to the very recent failure of 33 North in San Rafael, and we could go back to the problems/fraud at Fairfax "Vest Pocket"-monies lent, monies lost, owner skips, county sweeps under the rug.
Yes, AH pays one time fees, and let's agree they pay parcel taxes--which I just found are about 6% of my property tax bill. It's just that other 94% of the bill that needs to get covered to pay for the strain on services.
While I am sure you liked the report, you really should give some of it a second look.

Comment_arrow

Mindy Barstoff

9:38 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla,
Police are dealing with Wyndover daily. Last night I counted four police cars one ambulance and the paramedics. Meanwhile over in Hamilton a bank robber got away. We do not not have the infrastructure to support the projects. I am sick and ttired of paying for people who make poor choices. You have consistently denied that the Wyndover had problems, your credibility is gone. The only kind of revenue being generated from the projects are at the 7/11. If Novato wants more local revenue attract more high paying jobs, offer decent schools. More revenue will not happen when the local residents cannot leave their homes at night. The citizens of Novato are no longer asleep, your talking points are old and scripted we want change.

Comment_arrow

Marilyn

9:56 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla,
Please- ENOUGH with when Wyndover was built, using senior sites as examples and who is or isn't a mission-driven local non-profits......! Stop trying to talk around the issue - the tenants are the problem. The property owner - Fairfield Residential should be held accountable and it is the city of Novato's responsibility to turn the neighborhood around.

Comment_arrow

Bob

9:59 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Bay Vista is not without problems too. At the time that project became fully occupied the police already knew of residents being on the "Gang watch list". The new fire station, adjacent to Bay Vista, had gang graffiti spray painted on the station, paint gauged on the fire apparatus and their patio furniture stolen. The Fire District had to install a cyclone security fence and security cameras to protect the property.

The gangsters don't operate only within the confines of their neighborhood, they permeate the whole town as well as their gangster friends come here to do their dirty work.

Comment_arrow

Marla

10:59 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Bob,

33 North are luxory aparmtents. Not affordable at a time when the cost of living is extremely high and rising they will likely have a problem filling those units. I don't know if they have opened yet or not.

Comment_arrow

Marla

11:03 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

BOb,

What we have for affordable options in Novato is mostly senior housing; however, here are some examples of very sucessful multifamily homes in Marin including the Next Key, Creekside, Lanham Village, and Meadow Park all in Novato; 1H Street; Albert Lofts; Art Works Downtown; Deer valley Apartments; Alto Station; Belvedere Place; Doreta Mitchell; Fairfax Apartments; Pickleweed; Buckelew Homes for Disabled; Fireside; Sommerhill Townhomes; Lone Palm Court Apartments (84 units/acre- more than 3 times the density of Wyndover); Creekwood; Duncan Greene Court; Margaret Duncan Greene Apartments; 626 Del Ganado disabled; Lincoln Avenue; 1103 Lincoln Avenue disabled; Point Reyes Family Homes; Larkspur Isle; Edgewater Place; Centertown; Mariposa Apartments; Riviera Apartments; San Clemente; Turina house, Tiburon Hill Estates; Ecology House; Ridgeway Apartments; Voyager Carmel Program (disabled/homeless); Family Park; Fourth Street Program (homeless); Ponderosa Estates; The Hilarita (101 family units in Tiburon); Shelter Hill; Second Step (Battered Women/children); McInnis Park Apartments; Camino Alto Apartments; Oak Hill; San Rafael Town Center (over Cold Stone retail); Bay Point Lagoons; St Vincent de Paul (homeless); Foresters Hall; Clocktower Apartments; Highlands.

Toni Shroyer

10:06 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

If city council would stop the constant and consistant crime at Wyndover I wouldn't bring it up. If the city council was smart, they would hire more police less consultants and deal with the constant crime. But no, they'd rather play Ring Around The Rosie on who should be Mayor.
High density, multi-family, low income housing is a failed model. Ask any retired cop who is no longer muzzled, they will tell you "it has failed everywhere."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

10:20 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Points well taken. For what we spend on consultants -10k for a "study" on joining MCF, $465k for an out of state contractor to develop wayfarer signage to help residents and tourists get downtown, studies for new buildings, etc...you could put some money into what is a primary city responsibility-protecting the safety of citizens. If you look at the new MCF report (and, yes it is an MCF report)-you can read the fake numbers near the end, that all monies will be spent locally, which is garbage-does my Direct TV bill get paid locally?, my insurance? no...the contention is that all these dollars will get spent locally (which of course deprives other communities of those very same dollars), and since they will be spent at places employing low cost workers (they used dry cleaners as an example) then the whole thing becomes a perpetual motion machine...we built more HDAH, so people would spend locally, but now we need more HDAH to support the jobs...the existing model is not the answer. It makes some (MCF) feel good, but it really does nothing to benefit the long term health of the community.

Toni Shroyer

10:11 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Vote for change. Vote for hope. Vote Leslie Peterson Schwarze for City Council! Turn the direction of Novato around.

Reply

Lloyd

10:21 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

This is the same debate we had last time. We understand the realities of what AH means. we understand what a good neighbor is. we have listened to all sides. Now it time for all of us to tell the politicians what we are willing to do and not be told what to do by Sacramento, or the MCF that has made its motives known by super funding special interests groups that push a policy that doesn't work. These so called articles do nothing to answer the real questions and challenges. They cause this debate which is always divisive and forces many of us who would work to improve and help low wage residents, stand to the side because that isn't what we are really being asked to do. This nonsense of GHG used as a reason is disingenuous at best. If the majority of those commuting to Marin go to Central and Southern Marin building housing up north makes NO sense and completely flies in the face reason.
How about a little honesty and less rhetoric? Maybe then we can finally get to the core of the issues.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

10:39 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Lloyd
Agree on more honesty and less rhetoric. Trying to have an intellectual discussion with MCF/Greenbelt/Sustainable/blah blah blah is quite challenging. Maybe it is just time to go direct to the state, but you really need to take a long hard look at that too...killing redevelopment (aka City "Crack") may be a better way to go, but the City has committed to adding to their deficits by keeping it going...many, many stakeholders in the game...so called non profits (this is an IRS election), banks (get CRA credit for providing financing), LIHTC arrangers, builders, etc...So. Marin is always off the table, though, and it should not be.

Edwin Drake

10:22 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Why are we not making Wyndover pay PILOT, Payment in Lieu of Taxes? Is it too late to institute that? Even if everyone there were an angel, they still drive on Novato roads and use Novato services. There should be someway of capturing lost property tax revenue.

As for "high paying" jobs, I think In-N-Out Burger starts at $11.25. That's better than the $10 mentioned.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

10:29 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Don't know what PILOT is, do explain. I think we should pass a nuisance ordinance..more than "x" amount of police calls per quarter, you get charged full boat for the calls. Don't pay, get a lien on your property. Don't know if that is like PILOT or not...but at least it would get the issue front and center.

Bob Ratto

11:10 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla
Read this, all the way through...http://www.marinij.com/business/ci_18626007
It even covers the poster child of all that is good, Drakes...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marla

11:19 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I couldn't get the link to work, but I remember reading an article on it in the iJ, the issue is with the funding for the market rate portion of Drakes Way, the afforable units have already been built and are fully occupied with lengthy waitlists. If you look up on the Hill above the Larkspur Landing retail area, you can see them. They look like market rate homes, very nicely designed, near transit and services.

Comment_arrow

Marilyn

11:55 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Bob,
This link isn't working, could you repost?

Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

12:42 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Sorry, messed that up I guess

http://www.marinij.com/business/ci_18626007

Let's think about who is going to take the hit when this developer can't pay his bank loans...

Comment_arrow

Marla

12:56 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Bob, the article refers to botht he markt rate compelxes, Drakes Cove and 33 North. Niether is affordable and both are luxory homes. On the other had Drake's Way affordable neighborhood is finished, occupied and has a lenghty waitlist. I can see how it is confusing given the closeness of the names (Drakes Cove vs Drakes Way)

Tina McMillan

11:23 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla

Like you I want to help. I believe in the philosophy where you put the oxygen mask on first so that you don't pass out while trying to save your family. Novato needs to put on its "fiscal oxygen mask" before it moves forward with any other projects that increase the need for local services without an offsetting revenue base. For these studies to be valid they must look at more than just a few variables. The entire financial picture is essential to the outcome of any study.

For example, it is not reasonable to suggest that the schools have sufficient funds to add additional SED (socioeconomically disadvantaged) and ELL (English language learners) students to their roster. When you mix statistics concerning senior housing with family and multigenerational housing you ignore the needs of each population. There is and continues to be local support for senior housing with an age range of 62 and above, not 55 and under. Nova Ro was built by the local Rotarians not a mission driven nonprofit.

Reply

Tina McMillan

11:23 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

continued
I am relieved if newer housing developments are working for the residents and the neighbors. I do not believe Novato can continue to support this percentage of affordable housing without a tax base to balance the numbers. I know that our city budget is stretched to the extreme and that our schools cannot provide the needed services to existing ELL and SED students. Why would we want to further strain our schools by increasing the need for services to a population that we all ready serve? Novato has always been a melting pot of people from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, much more so than southern Marin. If we want to help, then we need to focus on the folks that are here and on bringing in businesses that will provide higher paying jobs to local residents.

Reply

Tina McMillan

11:32 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

The People Of Novato Need A Voice On The City Council; Vote Leslie Peterson Schwarze for Novato City Council And Be Heard!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan

2:23 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Leslie Peterson Schwarze didn't get the IJ endorsement for good reason - http://www.marinij.com/opinion/ci_19099842

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

9:57 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ryan

The reason is, that the IJ is bound and determined to only support incumbents and those that will go along to get along. They may be surprised when they see that Eric Lucan's platform actually promotes the same goals as Leslie Peterson Schwarze's platform. They are both against the downtown city office civic center, they are both for Suburban status with ABAG and Sacramento and they are both willing to take a hard look at the financial difficulties the city is facing. Eric is more closely aligned with Leslie than he is with Madeline or Jeanne. That being so, doesn't it make you wonder how the IJ can support Eric's platform but not Leslie's? It seems to me that they don't want more than one new voice on the council in order to maintain the status quo. Their dislike of Leslie is bias pure and simple.

VOTE LELSIE PETERSON SCHWARZE FOR NOVATO CITY COUNCIL. IT'S TIME FOR CHANGE. ITS TIME FOR FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

Marla

12:19 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

The new affordable Warner Creek senior development that just broke ground gave nearly $20,000 to Novato Unifed School Fees and will pay ongoing parcel taxes. That's more than our annual school fundraiser at San Jose Middle School likely made and those seniors aren't even using the services. Leslie opposed the development, but the 55+ thing is a red herring. Housing managers have told us 55+ developments have an average age of 70+. Also more than 1/3 of those Warner Creek units are for critically ill, so who cares what age they are? No school-aged child would ever suffer the "indignity" of living in a senior community, it just doesn't happen. Warern Creek offer classes for the seniors, computer learning, financial advise, social activites, health advice, gardening etc. It will be a real benefit to our community and it is too bad Leslie and other people chose to oppose it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Norwin

12:38 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Leslie Peterson Schwarze supports senior housing.
Leslie Peterson Schwarze supports Novato.
Leslie Peterson Schwarze for City Council.

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:07 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla

One time fees and parcel taxes are not enough to support our schools. If you have been following the Rancho debate you would see that we all ready have a sizable number of SED and ELL students in three schools that are now in program improvement status in spite of hefty title federal funds. Long story short we must be accountable to the families we all ready serve. We need both the funding to support our schools and the means of educating SED and ELL students. Recent research is inconclusive in this regard. Some innovative educators are suggesting that magnet schools might be the answer. In cases where students are non English speaking they would be educated in both languages. This is a radical shift from our current neighborhood schools uniform curriculum policies. Again, it is so much more complicated than what you are presenting.

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:08 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla continued
As far as Eden House goes, I hope the 55 and under is not the actual age of residents but it is in fact, the stated age of people who will be allowed to apply to live there. It seems questionable to have a nonprofit say that they are just using those numbers to satisfy federal funding sources but in actuality only intent on letting elderly and infirmed residents live there. The way it reads is that only one person in a unit must be 55 and subsequent people in the same unit can be of any age, younger or older. If again, that is accurate, isn't it dishonest to then only lease to clients that are in their 70's? If this development had the same criteria as Nova Ro I would be secure and confident that it was being run as advertised. The fact that they are saying two different things makes me suspicious.

Toni Shroyer

12:24 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla, the school parcel tax is 8.00 a month, hardly enough to support our Public Schools
Why did Eden Housing chose to leave the lot blighted for over 15 months after repeated requests to clean it up? Is that a good neighbor?
Leslie supports Senior Housing, yet has the guts to ask the hard questions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marla

12:50 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Toni,

As you heard Eden's Executive Driector mention at the Council meeting, they hired a local firm to check on the lot and clean it three times per week, and mow the weeds etc. during the two years it took to gather the fudning needed to break ground. The fact that an empty lot next to a liquor/grocery store open until 11pm got some debris is not surprising despite their contract and efforts. Look at any vacant lot around town and you will see the same thing. As she mentioned, the best way to deal with that is to build the housing and no longer have an empty lot of weeds. Eden Housing has a termendous track record as one of the premier developer and managers of affordable homes with over two dozen awards and many beautiful, well managed, well designed neighborhoods in the Bay Area. Those who support nicely designed and well managed senior affordable homes should be laying out the red carpet for this project, not opposing it. I don't believe the parcel tax is fixed no matter how many units or the size fo your lot. I think they'll pay more for the 60 units, but will have to check. In anycase, the $20,000 they already gave NUSD will be put to good use I'm sure.

Bob Ratto

1:34 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Marla
Monahan Pacific is the builder of 33 North, Drake's Way, and Drake's Cove...they are the builder..EAH was the developer...

Reply

Toni Shroyer

1:45 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Annan Patterson, please tell us how much you make from pushing your high density low income housing agenda. Why are you not telling the people? Did you tell people that were endorsing SUNN that the city of Novato will go broke with your agenda? This is about land grabbing and rezoning people's personal property. Did you tell them that? Did you tell them that non-profit housing does not pay any real estate taxes? Did you tell them that there is no law that requires crime free housing? Did you tell them where the jobs were for new residents? Did you tell them that our police are on a bare bones staff (thanks to the city council) and more people will not mean more police services?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan

2:22 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You're just lashing out because Leslie Peterson Schwarze didn't get the IJ endorsement and they know that rants like this have no base in fact. It's a great article - http://www.marinij.com/opinion/ci_19099842

Ryan

2:21 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You're just lashing out because Leslie Peterson Schwarze didn't get the IJ endorsement and they know that rants like this have no base in fact. It's a great article - http://www.marinij.com/opinion/ci_19099842

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Ratto

2:33 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I think it would be "basis", in fact. Thanks

Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:16 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

...and knowing the IJ is solidly a partisan and agenda driven organization, how would we not say that the IJ itself is not "lashing out" against candidates it does not endorse?

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:12 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ryan

You keep saying the same thing without attempting to look at the facts. Check out Eric's platform. It looks like he's taking his cues from Leslie. His main points are in direct opposition to both Madeline and Jeanne. The IJ picked Eric because he appears acquiescent. They may be in store for a surprise...

Toni Shroyer

2:36 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ryan? Is that your real name? No last name....because???

The Marin IJ endorsed two incumbents that violated The Brown Act. The IJ obviously wants business as usual and has not been kind to the good people of Novato....calling us, "the city of rage"? How about "The city that is informed".

Leslie Peterson Schwarze is not beholden to the status quo and the special interest groups. She is beholden to the good people of Novato. A critical thinker a voice of reason.
I am tired of the crime at Wyndover Apartments. I am tired of the gang activity not only there, but at Bay Vista. I am tired of the city spending thousands and thousands on consultants and cutting our police to a skeleton staff. I can't imagine people wanting more of the same...
There has been fantastic support all over Novato for Leslie. People want their voice to be heard and she is the people's hope!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan

2:42 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I don't think so.She's not getting endorsements from any organizations. You're telling me they are all wrong? They can see through her just like the IJ did. They probably see how Leslie (and you) are trying to blow crime out of proportion to help her politically.You know crime is actually down in Novato compared to 10 or 20 years ago. Or is the police chief wrong just like the IJ and every other organization who didn't endorse Leslie?

Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:59 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

@Ryan - Crime is "down" as an aggregate across the country per the FBI reports over the last decades. No one wants to return to the crime stats of the 1970's-1980's. That is not specific to Novato, though Marin is certainly not Alameda county either, and is slightly irrelevant to this specific conversation.

Certain crimes are problematic in the area, and how we look at the crime issue needs to be very Novato centric based on what I just said earlier. Gang affiliated crime, along with organized gang members themselves seems to be rooting, as the Novato police chief himself has already acknowledged. There are certain trends which need to be examined in terms of a post 2008 economy; we need to watch since some crimes have trended up recently - like property crimes, burglary, and theft.

The IJ is known to under represent crime in their reporting, and is decidedly politically correct on stories over reporting simple truth and facts. I wouldn't base my entire position on the environment on what the IJ says.

Toni Shroyer

2:46 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ryan,
It's okay to violate The Brown Act? Your organizations think so?

Reply

Ryan

2:52 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You'd have to ask them. But seriously - The Brown Act? Wow. What a scandal! First Anthony Weiner, not the Brown Act in Novato! You know these Councilmembers. There's nothing sinister going on there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:14 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

...that's called a "straw man" argument and doesn't actually say anything. Try to address the points directly.

Toni Shroyer

3:09 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I think it is important to follow The Brown Act. The people deserve to have a voice. We still live in a democracy. I don't reward bad behavior, the IJ apparently does. They wrote an Editorial on how awful it was for Novato's City Council to have not followed The Brown Act and then endorsed the two incumbents!
I will no longer be engaging with someone who does not give their full and real name.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:18 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Toni - full names on the internet are irrelevant on a public forum. I do not know who Toni Shroyer is personally, and I certainly don't know that "Toni Shroyer" is posting every time with accredited authority as this persona on Patch. We just address arguments as they are written here.

Ryan

3:16 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Do you think it's a pattern or just a one time thing?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:33 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

... I cannot answer that myself with certainty but since you say "Do you think", I think like many do in commonly accepted knowledge that rarely people are caught violating their first time and only time. More often than not, it is habitual in many higher or lower ways and eventually you are noticed and served notice. It usually indicates as an alert to direction and possibly intent. Either way, it is problematic.

diane

3:26 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I live in San Rafael and I shop in Novato and North of there as far as Rohnert Park.
San Rafael complains about revenue, yet the current candidates for City Council do not approve of National or "Big Box" stores. If they want people to shop local, they should have the store that people want to shop at. And BTW, I hope "Appeal SMART" gets on the ballot and wins. If you agree, please contact them for information. They are on Facebook.

Reply

Marilyn

3:50 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Vote on the IJ
http://www.marinij.com/
Should Marin do more to make housing affordable?

Total Votes = 331
Yes 112 Votes, or 33.83 %
No 219 Votes, or 66.16 %

Reply

Lloyd

4:07 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I would also add the Marin I J is only as accurate as its editorial bias. It would be accurate to say they represent an opinion as opposed to factual reporting.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Jim Welte

4:20 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

With all due respect to the participants on this thread, and while we do appreciate the discussion, let's keep it focused on the Live Local report and related issues, please. Thanks!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

4:36 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Just honestly wondering: Who are "we" and are you speaking directly for I assume all the Patch staff?

To add, while there is a spread here a little, most of it is staying in orbit and gravity to the article. It is a big topic with layers, and people are speaking to layers.

Patch_comments_icon

Jim Welte

4:41 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I'm speaking for myself, one of the Marin Patch editors. And you're absolutely right - the vast majority of the comments here are staying well within the orbit. But while there are certainly layers, unfair generalizations about a purported bias at the IJ is not one of them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

4:46 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I thought you might mentioned that. For one it is Ryan who has been interjecting IJ as an authority to the conversation. It is his opinion. This then is met with other opinions, like my own, about the IJ. It is not an unfair generalization, it is an opinion as a reply to an assertion being made here by another.

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:19 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Jim

I disagree. When the IJ used the title "City of Rage" describing Novato I spoke with Brad, hoping he would at least appreciate how inflammatory the title was. He was nonplussed. I was offended. I cancelled my subscription. I found the title and the defense of it repugnant. I believe there is a bias at the IJ and that it speaks for itself in its articles and editorials.

Steven Norwin

5:26 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

This is factual, You couldn't pay me to read the Marin Idependand Journal. I do not like their journalism. Facts, nothing but facts!

Reply

JoEllen Ussery

5:42 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I'm not sure if I'm more disturbed that $1,200 a month is a low income rent? Or that $50,000 a year makes you eligible for that low income rent?

Reply

Tina McMillan

10:28 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
"30%"Limit 22,450/ 25,650/ 28,850/ 32,050/ 34,650/ 37,200/ 39,750/ 42,350
"50%" Limit 37,400/ 42,750/ 48,100/ 53,400/ 57,700/ 61,950/ 66,250/ 70,500
"60%" Limit 44,880/ 51,300/ 57,720/ 64,080/ 69,240/ 74,340/ 79,500/ 84,600
"80%" Limit 59,850/ 68,400/ 76,950/ 85,450/ 92,300/ 99,150 /106,000/ 112,800

These are the Marin County 2011 Income levels based on number of people in household and percentage of total for earnings limits.
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/fa/home/2011_incomelimitseffective_july13-Correctedfor%20SanDiego.pdf

Reply

Stacey

8:26 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Dick Spotswood: County supervisors should have told HUD to 'get lost' 10/16/11
http://www.marinij.com/opinion/ci_19116465#.Tpr2MZzHzh4.email

Reply

Steven Norwin

9:15 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Most Marinites are not racists. They actively support nondiscrimination. That counts for little. The reality is that housing activists resent that upper-middle class whites and Asians can afford to live in attractive, crime-free communities.
<<<CLICK BELOW TO READ DICK SPOTSWOOD'S LATEST IJ ARTICLE>>>
http://www.marinij.com/opinion/ci_19116465#.Tpr2MZzHzh4.email

Reply

Leave a comment