patching...
Breaking: Man Angry at Police Tries to Gauge Out Officer's Eye »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Council Candidates Avoid Rage in Chamber Forum

Five candidates for three seats unanimous in defense of Novato's image in wake of controversial newspaper piece.

 

There was a noticeable absence of rage Friday morning when five of the seven candidates for three Novato City Council seats shared the dais at a forum hosted by the Novato Chamber of Commerce and the Southern Pacific Smokehouse.

Several candidates took umbrage with an Aug. 27 story in the Marin Independent Journal that characterized Novato as a city of rage, a description based on the animated and sometimes heated comments made at civic meetings over the past year. The story prompted a large repsonse — mostly angry and rage-filled — in letters to the editor in the IJ and on Novato Patch.

“I encourage residents to stay engaged,” said incumbent Jeanne MacLeamy, who with Madeline Kellner is running to hold onto her council seat.

MacLeamy and Kellner — the current mayor — discussed the issues on the Smokehouse’s music stage along with challengers Eric Lucan, Leslie Peterson Schwarze and Eleanor Sluis. Manny Fernandez did not accept the chamber’s invitation and Jerome Ghigliotti did not show up after telling organizers he would be there.

The debate was filmed by Jazzed About Media and will be shown on Novato Public Access Television several times in the months before the Nov. 8 election.

With moderator Dick Spotswood handling the questions, the topics included:

  • the plan for a new city administrative office in the downtown area
  • affordable housing, major developments on the North Redwood Boulevard
  • corridor and Hanna Ranch, controlling pension costs and other liabilities
  • government communication and transparency
  • revitalizing Old Town business district
  • enhancing city revenue
  • attracting new businesses
  • the spending of sales tax money from Measure F
  • repairing the “city of rage” image.

The two incumbents, both known for being calculated, succinct, unemotional and results-oriented in their decision-making, agreed on many of the same issues and stood firm on the council’s May decision to construct a 22,000-square-foot office building for about 60 city staff members on a parking lot at the corner of Machin Avenue and Cain Lane in Old Town. The council and city staff members have taken heat recently — including a petition drive to halt the project altogether — because of the expected cost of $12 million to $15 million in capital improvement funds.

Peterson Schwarze and Sluis said the topic should be brought back to the council again for more public input, a viewpoint agreed on by more than 1,000 people who have signed the petition.

“It’s not going to cost us $15 million. In the long run it is going to cost us more like $40 million,” said Peterson Schwarze, a former member of the Novato Unified School District board of trustees. “It will eat up some parking and it will be vacant three days a week. I think we have to look at it again.”

Sluis, a retired teacher, listed other ways to spend the money, ranging from replacing storm drains, updating our utilities and contributing to the Novato Theater renovation effort. She said there are plenty of available properties to serve as a home for city employees, including Novato City Hall and the Hill Education Center.

“We need to look at the (long-closed) Community House … maybe it’s more beneficial to tear it down and put the city offices there,” she said.

Lucan, a businessman who was born and raised in Novato, was milder in his objection to the new city office plan. He said it’s important for the city to get out of its $650,000-per-year lease at 75 Rowland Way and that he’d be interested in keeping the options open longer on the downtown plan until the actual costs of the building construction are pinpointed.

The candidates were unanimous in their disagreement with the “city of rage” label. MacLeamy criticized the newspaper for shouldering Novato with that image and said people speaking out is a just demonstration of democracy.

“Who wouldn’t be upset if people were coming after your pocket book and your property?” she said, referring to taxation and state affordable housing quotas. “In those times when we’ve had development on our agenda, we’ve had people come out and protest. With this affordable housing issue, we had 15 properties being discussed all at one, so you had 15 neighborhoods all upset. This is the democratic process.”

Keller said, “I’ve been walking precincts lately and I can tell you this is not a city of rage. Behind all of those doors, there are so many people who love this town, who want to stay here and want to look out for their neighbors. … I think we’ve moved on and I think I’ve done a good job maintaining a level of civility at our meetings. We’re doing just fine here in Novato.”

Lucan acknowledged that there are some angry people who spoke up at recent meetings, but “if elected to the council, one of my top goals will be to build consensus through clear and transparent government.” Sluis said sometimes she feels like a “momma grizzly bear” as she tries to protect Novato from crowded conditions, and Peterson Schwarze jokingly admitted to being one of the angry people.

“We are not misbehaving when we’re acting within the rights of our country where you are allowed to say what you want,” she said.

In closing statements, MacLeamy and Kellner stood by their track records of the past four years and emphasized the need for fiscal sustainability, business development and efficient use of resources. Lucan mentioned his passion for his hometown, his business background and that it he believes it is “time to provide a new voice on the City Council.” Peterson Schwarze touted her school board experience, professed her loves for the small-town feel of Novato and that the community is involved enough to speak up. Sluis credited her Missouri roots for her “buck stops here” attitude and described Novato as a bouquet that needs to be preserved.

Here is the Marin IJ's coverage of this debate.

Related Topics: Candidate Forum, Eleanor Sluis, Eric Lucan, Jeanne MacLeamy, Jerome Ghigliotti, Leslie Peterson Schwarze, Madeline Kellner, Manny Fernandez, Novato City Council, and angry

Mark Schoenbaum

7:05 pm on Friday, September 9, 2011

The incumbents have to go, I just wish we had better candidates to replace them with.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:13 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Mark

Peterson-Schwarze, Sluis and Lucan are all excellent candidates. Your vote should be based on the issues. FInd out where each candidate stands on the issues and you will know whom to vote for.

Ross Ingels

7:54 pm on Friday, September 9, 2011

The incumbents have got to go. This is our chance to get the council to listen and realize we are watching all year long. Nothing would speak louder to the current and future council members than some turnover.

Reply

Travis Howard

7:56 pm on Friday, September 9, 2011

This event was well worth getting up early for! All of the candidates did a great job representing their viewpoints. I especially enjoyed Eleanor's props...such a teacher!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hutch Turner

3:27 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

The current downtown City Hall discussion is a “the dog ate my homework” issue. Where were these people two years ago when the public discussion was begun? If they felt so strongly about this option why were they apparently asleep – not a positive qualification for a seat on the City Council? This is a City of 50,000 people, not a frat house.

Particularly disturbing is that most of those non-candidates attempting to revisit the decision have a personal economic interest at stake i.e. a bar/restaurant owner, shop owners. Have those business owners who will benefit from additional parking establish an assessment district to pay for the parking they want – not Novato taxpayers.

Some Council candidates are supporting this revisit effort despite passing on numerous previous opportunities to express their opinion before the City Council. These candidates should catch up on their sleep before they run for office.

Nick Mason

9:50 pm on Friday, September 9, 2011

So the moderator of the forum - in response to the article - is a columnist for the very publication that is responsible for the upset? Sounds like 'damage control' to me.

Reply

Nick Mason

9:52 pm on Friday, September 9, 2011

I thought jerome ghigliotti was supposed to be running. Why wasn't he at the meeting? Patch needs to stop giving that blowhard so much free press.

Reply

RB

12:37 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Jerome Ghigliotti represents a majority of what people REALLY think. If each and every legal citizen of our community were told the facts about the true cost's of supporting ILLEGAL'S there would no longer be ILLEGALS here. I'm talking about the cost of Welfare, Housing, Medical/Dental, Education. $690-$900 million every year. Our schools in Calif, have gone from the top to the bottom. And here's why. Half to three-quarters of the students in school come here speaking NO ENGLISH and that grinds the educational process to a halt. Our kid's can't get an education because they are stifled by kid's who don't speak the language. And their parents have no desire whatsoever to speak the language themselves. They simply refuse.

People for the most part give quick (i'm busy and don't have the time nor the inclination to look deeply at all the ramifications and the cost's of having and supporting ILLEGAL'S in OUR community) answers but when pressed with all the FACT'S the majority of people support his point of view. But they have to be hit over the head. And the masses don't want to think, and they don't want to get involved so they just go along with the majority. Just like sheep and lemmings. Mediocrity and Myopic minds abound in our governments, large and small. More people need to challenge the Denial based Co-Dependent insanity of mediocre minds. It's time to clean house and take OUR community back from the people who have been selling OUR birthright away for popular votes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:15 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

The majority of people in Novato do not agree with Jerome.

Comment_arrow

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

11:35 pm on Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Thank you. Tell your friends and relatives to read the Novato Patch, and make their vote count in November.

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

8:50 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

I do apologize that I missed the forum. I have clearly stated my intentions in the past. I am standing for council member in Novato, because the current council has made it their policy to ignore the will of the people of Novato. The council represents the people of Novato, and not Sacramento politicians. Politicians often talk a good game, and avoid answers. I refuse to do either. My platform is as below. It takes two other council members with the same commitments to succeed, but these are my goals.
PLATFORM
Enact E-Verify ordinance, so that Novatoans can control how their tax dollars are spent.
No more affordable housing, challenge the state law, challenge the quotas
Ordinance defining the succession of the position of mayor
Equal enforcement of the law
Equal enforcement of code violations
No more Redevelopment investments without security
Low income housing ownership that does not properly maintain and control their properties to lose their tax exempt status
New City Manager To restore code enforcement to protect the community
New City Attorney For honest representation of citizen goals
New Police Chief For gang crime and gang violence suppression
I sign everything that I do because I am proud of it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

10:22 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Jerome

It is against the law to ignore affordable housing mandates. That is why the adhoc committee worked to find reasonable accommodations to the housing element that included lower density. That is why Huffman went to Sacramento with a bill to change the requirements to include foreclosed properties being rebuilt and to challenge our density requirements.

Your platform ignores existing laws and then chooses which laws to enforce. You cannot choose which laws to enforce. You must be able to work with other council members, the city manager and the residents whose views may be different from your own. Those sitting on the city council represent all of Novato, not just the people that voted for them.

Comment_arrow

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

3:39 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Tina, no, I do not advocate "ignoring" the law. That is what the current council has done. I advocate challenging the low income housing laws and how they are applied. Current information is that Novato has 30% of the county population and 50% of the low income housing. Also, the laws mandating low income housing may - themselves - be unconstitutional. Someone mentioned Article 34 which makes it illegal to mandate low income housing unless the community votes in favor of it. I have not researched Article 34, but I advocate that it be researched. Tina, admit it, you are just a person who believes that everyone should have everything, regardless of whether they earned it or not. You ignore that the "pie" of benefits is only as large as those who are contributing into it. Currently, we have more "takers" than "contributors". That cannot go on forever.

Toni Shroyer

9:01 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Great event! Thank you Chamber!
The Shroyer Family is endorsing
LESLIE PETERSON SCHWARZE!

We need a council member who will not cut police services, stop the consultant dependant culture of the city, and use those resources to help CLEAN UP THE CRIME at the Wyndover Apartments.
For over 14 months I have asked the city council to help protect the residents that live in the low-income projects and the surrounding community. Instead we have 55 sworn officers from 67 and NO School Resource officers. We use to have 3.
We need Leslie on the city council for our public safety and to increase public safety!

Reply

JAN

11:05 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

My wife and I moved here 6 weeks ago and love the community. Novato is a gem. Grinding about politicians and grousing over decisions vetted and made is nothing new to us. I suggest you enjoy the community you have. I got stopped at DUI checkpoint last weekend and enjoyed meeting a truly professional group of officers. I was sober, so that also helped.

Look out your window, no smog, no flying dust and no ever present wind. Fog in the morning and clear sky s after 10:00. We are about an hour from San Francisco with the symphony, museums, Fisherman's Wharf and all sorts of theater.

Egads, you don't realize how good you have it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

11:11 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Jan

I totally agree with you about how fortunate we are to be in such a wonderful town. I have lived here for 30 years. As I drive to work in the morning people are out walking their dogs, the air smells like autumn and my office looks out over the creek and into bay and pine trees.

However, many of the issues being discussed on Patch have to do with continuing to enjoy a city that will have the financial resources to pave the streets and pay the police. We have a five year projected budget deficit due to the subprime crash and the ongoing recession that is eating at the heart of our city services. Many people are not so much griping as trying to find ways to help. Keep reading, keep posting see what you think.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Brent Ainsworth

2:27 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Awesome comment, Jan. Welcome to Novato.

Just My Opinion

11:11 am on Saturday, September 10, 2011

I attended this event and was very glad I did. I now have questions about my choices for the election. Jerome, I wish you had been there, I would have liked to hear you speak directly to some of these questions. Only by informing ourselves on the candidates and their platforms can we make good choices. I want to hear from the "horses mouth" not only what I read or hear second hand.

Reply

Craig Belfor

12:16 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Jerome might not be liked on all of his issues, but his fight to enact E-Verify, a federal law requiring verification of legal status has been a requirement for many years on the federal level. This would ensure that contractors who do business with the government pay the prevailing wage rate for the workers on the job.This means no underpaid cash illegals would be taking jobs away from legal workers, and contractors could not profit from their lower bids.

I was on the Federal Records Center moving job in the 70s when we moved the federal records center from Spear Street in San Francisco to Sneath Lane in San Bruno, and the Watson Act, a federal law covered this. In 1981 my own company moved the last army special forces group at Hamilton and took it to Moffit. Humvies, forklifts, desks, and all other equipment went, and I and had to verify the status and pay scale of every worker on the job. When I do work for the State of California, I must also submit to these regulations.
Why can't Novato?

What's the connection here? Jerome got the required signature to put this on the ballot, but the city council won't do it, so he's suing them to do it. He just want's Novato Citizens to have the right to vote on this issue.We need some other voices on this council.

P.S.- I've never even met Jerome. I just want to vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

1:16 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Craig

Like you I originally supported Jerome's petition for EVerify. It seemed to make sense at the time. Several things changed my mind about the statute in its current form. The first is that California has not yet enacted EVerify throughout the state and as a result we have the hypocrisy of using illegal farm labor. I would like to see a guest worker program for agriculture and the entire state using EVerify before I support it here in Novato. Second issue is that Jerome's single focus on illegal immigration makes him a poor candidate for city council, along with the fact that he is suing the city for 2.3 million in pain and suffering. Civil Rights Activists didn't sue when they were arrested for protest. Jerome knew that the council rules were to face the council when speaking. He needs to follow the same rules as everyone else or accept the consequences. Last, I believe in following the law to change the law. Ignoring the housing element would have been disastrous. The adhoc committee worked within the law to change it. City workers found we needed less affordable housing than originally thought as a result of Buck and Eden house. Our current council may not be perfect but they do not deserve to be demonized.

Comment_arrow

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

3:46 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Craig, the information that I have is that the federal government requires federal contractors to use E-Verify. At the state and local level, the US Supreme Court has already spoken, there is NO FEDERAL PREEMPTION. States and lcaol government can handle E-Verify as they so vote. Those in Sacramento who see no distinctino between "legal" and "illegal" are currently pushing a bill that would take away any city's right to enact an E-Verify ordinance. Who elected these guys to Sacramento. The pie is only so big. When the "takers" exceed the "contributors" the system will collapse.

Comment_arrow

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

3:53 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Tina, you operate in a vacuum. Yes civil rights activists DO sue when they are arrested. No, there was no council rule about facing the council members. After I was arrested, Kellner tried to impose a "facing" rule. However that rule violated the Brown Act Open Meetings law. The week after Kellner imposed the "facing" rule she withdrew it, because she was told that it violated the Brown Act. For the next month, I addressed the audience with my back to the council and they had to sit and simmer. I was falsely arrested because criticized the illegal acts of the council and they tried to intimidate me out of my free speech right. The whole purpose of civil rights laws is that they created the ability to sue when our civil rights were violated. If the police broke into your house and hauled you away because they thought that you had violated a law that does not exist, you would sue.

Nancy Jones

12:33 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Fellow Novatoans -- please do your homework before voting in November for the next City Council. Please make sure the candidates you vote for represent your views, hopes and aspirations for our town. The incumbents need to be replaced as they do not represent the majority of Novatoans.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

2:30 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Nancy

I agree we need to do our homework. I am not certain that any one person running for council exactly represents my views, hopes and aspirations. I see it more as a compromise with my primary issues being: Balanced Housing, Fiscal Responsibility and Transparent Government.

What issues would you like to see addressed by the people running for council? Maybe the Patch could interview each person with a set of questions designed to give us all feedback about the issues that we feel are most important.

Craig Belfor

1:27 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Tina-
We could bring back the Bracero Program to help in seasonal jobs, but it would not solve all of the problems we face with this issue here. I did not say Jerome would be a good council pick- we need more than a one trick pony here, and I'm in awe of the balls the council juggles under pressure now. BTW- I'm also in awe of the amount of work and research you do. That, coupled with common sense is what a council member should be. What about You?

Reply

Tina McMillan

2:45 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Craig

Thank you. I really enjoy doing the research. Between work and family responsibilities I know I cannot handle the commitment it takes to serve on the council. Most of my posting is late at night or on weekends. That is why I admire even the existing council's efforts on our behalf. I like the previous city manager's approach much better. Perhaps it is just the times but I don't agree with Mr. Frank's insistence on building new offices as well as the group that was hired in 2010 to designate affordable housing sites and the Boston based signage company. I don't think Mr. Frank really "gets" Novato. I have been reading the information about why they decided to build and it still doesn't make sense to me why they wouldn't purchase the IJ building, for example, at approximately 6 million. It has a lot of potential. The only reason given so far has been location but it is right off the freeway and on a bus route. I keep wondering if this is some attempt to keep the redevelopment district open and avoid the measure that was passed in 2004 that limits the council's ability to build anything new over a million dollars without a vote. See if you can make sense of this link. I have been trying to find the original measure.

http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/RV/main/Measures/2004/Nov/MeasureF.pdf

Reply

Hutch Turner

3:24 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Being held accountable is not equivalent to be demonized. There is now significant gang activity in Novato that didn't exist on a significant level five years ago. This activity paralleled the substantial increase in Novato’s Latino residence. The Nortenos and Surenos are the two major gangs. To ignore the pervasiveness and influence of these two groups is naive. The Marin City gangs now reach into Wyndover apartments. Novato is not as “nice” as it once was and dog walking is definitely down around Wyndover.

Many people voted for SMART to provide a significant transportation option only to have ABAG use SMART to drive funding for unwanted high density affordable housing. Many feel their trust in State and Regional Agencies has been betrayed and their good intentions used against them. It is not against the law to object – yet.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig Belfor

3:35 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Hutch- on your earlier reply comment about our non participation 2 years ago when these issues were starting to unfold, we did not have the Patch then. Newspapers are history, the Patch is now. By the time it gets to a newspaper, it's often too late, but the e news is up to date.

Comment_arrow

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

3:54 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Hutch, welcome to the Tell-It-Like-It-Is Club.

Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

5:42 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Hutch

You're wrong about the gang activity not being there 5 years ago. It has been building over time along with the graffiti and the drug use. No one is suggesting we ignore the problem. In fact there is support for hiring more police to handle the problem. However to hire more police we need revenue.

I don't know why people voted for SMART. There have been financial problems since the beginning. I believe it was pushed through by former Supervisor McGlashen. It is not being developed as a commuter train but as a designer train. Even Caltrain has had to cut back services due to funding problems in spite of extensive ridership.

I understand the sense of betrayal but I believe we have to stay level headed in order to accomplish anything. There have been people who have demonized the council in an unjustified manner. It is simply my opinion that while I don't agree with them on all issues neither do I see them as bad people.

Hutch Turner

3:55 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Yes, digital beats paper. It's a great improvement. No more slanty eyed editor/censors.

Nonetheless, all of the current candidates except Fernandez were very aware of the extensive discussion on City Hall locations. All were actively involved in the Novato political gestalt monitoring what was being weighed. To have them all of a sudden find their voice defies credibility and this weakness should be kept in mind when deciding who to vote for in the next election. .

$35 was the charge to witness the candidate discussion before the Novato Chamber of Commerce. Pretty indicative of who feels like they run this town. Perhaps the public employee's unions will open the doors. The Novato City Council spends so much time behind closed doors in closed sessions they have no tan lines.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

6:22 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Hutch
I agree the ball was dropped by many of us, on the city offices issue but two years ago the plan was to buy an existing building. I thought that was the main focus. I thought the plan was to buy 75 Rowland. Who knew, outside of the council and the city manager's office that the owner had no intention of selling. Then in June/July 2010, as a community, we refocused on affordable housing when they suggested turning the Square into a high density multifamily housing development along with other sites throughout Novato.

I missed the part about the council being able to decide, without any voter input, on a $16 million dollar building project that houses fewer than 100 employees and generates no revenue. I thought we had a measure that said any building project over $1.7 million had to go to the voters. I am still trying to find the original measure to see where, why and how I was mistaken. I remember a vote in 1987 to allow special elections regarding this issue. It seemed to me that spending that kind of money and creating bond debt are issues big enough to require a vote of the residents. Henry's campaign against putting the city offices downtown was for me the first ray of hope in an otherwise significant financial boondoggle. In an election year who knows what could change…

http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/RV/main/Measures/2004/Nov/MeasureF.pdf If anyone else can understand this measure please help explain what it means…

Pam Drew

4:10 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

When will the Novato City Council Candidates' Forum be aired next on Novato Public Access TV for those of us who couldn't go?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tina McMillan

6:28 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jazzed-About-Media/122230904462949
http://novato.patch.com/listings/novato-public-access-television

Here are the links to the two groups responsible for the taping. Please let me know if it shows up anywhere; I couldn't find it either.

Tina McMillan

6:01 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Jerome

In my opinion, your experience does not justify wasting the council's time, the city attorney's time and the court's time with a $2.3 million dollar law suit. I supported EVerify until I realized the hypocrisy involved in a system that is used selectively. Until we include a guest worker program there is no way to pick crops and have farms use EVerify. That is why it is being debated on a state level in California. All you have to do is Google search the issue and you can see the dilemma posed by the current situation.

I don't live in a vacuum, I just don't happen to agree with you on the way in which you approach resolving these problems. That is part of what is wonderful about living in a democracy. You and I can have different opinions and still be neighbors. We have been down this road before on other posts. We may be looking at some of the same issues but the road to our solutions is very different. You have said repeatedly that your only focus is illegal immigration. I want a council member who is capable of working with many issues and working well with his colleagues.

Reply

Steven Norwin

6:25 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Tina, I think we DO need a council member who will focus on illegal immigration and Gangs. Novato was not like this 5 yrs ago. You can believe that it's been going on for 20 years but that's a bunch of BS. 5-6 years ago I never heard of drive by shootings and attempted murders in Novato or noticed the grafitti like I do today or the wierdos walking around just hanging on the side of the Frank Howard Allen Building on Diablo or cruising Novato with their pants falling down or the very young girls pushing multiple babys in strollers and mutiple toddlers walking along in the middle of busy streets/intersections while talking on cell phones. We have a chance of changing the course ....Please don't down play the danger our town is in. We are on our way towards becoming the next Vallejo.

Reply

Tina McMillan

6:40 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

Steven

I am not downplaying the issue of illegal immigration but a "one trick pony" does not a council member make. An Activist, yes. If Jerome wants to just focus on this issue he has other ways of making a difference.

We have had problems with gang graffiti and crime, in my neighborhood since my boys were in PV more than ten years ago. Some of the young people with their pants down are kids copying gangster rap, reality TV shows and other media related garbage. I don't like it either but it is not always connected to illegal immigration or gangs.

If you are worried about Novato becoming another Vallejo then think fiscal conservative. Novato's plan to build a $16 million dollar city office is a waste.

Not all young immigrant families are illegal immigrant families. The last kid that was prosecuted in a drive by was a San Marin girl who got angry at her boyfriend and got 11 years in jail for chasing him in a car with another person shooting a gun out the sunroof. Not all crime is illegal immigrant crime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr

11:39 pm on Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Not all crime is illegal alien crime. But there is a very easy way to curtail illegal alien crime. Stop inviting illegal aliens to "vive, trabaja y vende las drugas aqui".

Chris Corbett

6:53 pm on Saturday, September 10, 2011

i grew up in novato in the 70s and 80s and there were always some weirdos. but you are right, south san francisco (where i live now) and novato are becoming very similar---gangs are running the joint!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

12:59 am on Sunday, September 11, 2011

Has anyone for example spent any time around the creek area behind the Grant CVS and running up and down through the library on S. Novato? Some characters around there for sure, open substance abuse, and other characters that through my experience around Oakland and Richmond, look pretty spot on like "traders" in substances too, definitely hollering out to friends with selective clothing like gang members do. Not to mention guys that look too old to find riding a bike "fun" that have the whole street look and play... uhhuh... There are a few little areas all around town which if on foot, you will start noticing some things.

Since we have no street beat type law enforcement they operate in many areas without much view to them. But again, I invite people to get out and walk the "other" areas of Novato and find out what I am talking about.

There are a lot of people in Novato, even here in this comment's section, who are certainly not aware (or being disingenuous) of the growing underbelly in this community and activity going on. I mean if all you do though is get in your car between errands, work, and getting something to eat, you certainly may not notice that at all.

Angela

9:51 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Bravo Tina McMillan! - The Pacific Sun says:

"Perhaps in the towns lived in by the author of this hit piece there are only conceptual affordable housing developments but in Novato we have 30% of the real affordable housing developments in Marin along with the first Habitat for Humanity home. Prejudice is at its worst when reading Pac Sun on Novato. Surely someone at this paper has actually read the numbers to see how much Novato does, without ABAG telling it what to do, to create affordable and fiscally sustainable housing." " It is tiresome to hear critics both outside of Novato and from within label the community as unfriendly and unhelpful. "

"Housing developers, like Katie Crecelius would have you believe that the only cost of affordable housing is in its being built. They do not consider the impact of property without taxes on a fragile economy and boast that sales tax alone will cover the cost."

"Novato has and will continue to meet ABAG guidelines. Unlike our southern Marin neighbors, Ross for example, who use unrealistic zoning to meet their housing element, i.e., the botanical gardens are zoned affordable; we in Novato walk our talk. The Pacific Sun needs to get off its high horse and recognize that Marin's northernmost neighbors both practical and compassionate when it comes to affordable housing mandates."

"One of the city council candidates that support balanced housing is LESLIE PETERSON SCHWARZE. "

Reply

Leave a comment